The Lewisham Mayoral Elections: Chris Maines

This Q&A is part of Brockley Central's virtual hustings. The Liberal Democrat candidate for Mayor, Cllr Chris Maines, answers our questions. Click for answers from Cllr Dean Walton, Sir Steve Bullock and Simon Nundy.

1. How will you improve Lewisham's local high streets – in particular, Brockley Cross, Lewisham Way, Brockley Road and Ladywell Road?

The new Mayor needs to work with local communities to produce a vision for Lewisham over the next 15/20 years, part of that will be how we think neighbourhoods will develop and how we protect them against both external and local pressures. Lewisham has weak planning guidance. I would like to see planning framework that defines the key elements of local high streets and that can be used to block change of use applications, if there is a resulting loss.

I have campaigned to retain sub post offices around Lewisham, as I see them as anchors to many local parades.

By devolving budgets to strengthen ward assemblies, the local community can explore ways of improving their own shopping areas – environmental improvements, changing parking restrictions, local promotions etc.

2. Will you ensure that plans for the part-pedestrianisation of Coulgate Street happen and in what time frame?

I do not agree with the system of elected mayor and would want to devolve many responsibilities (such as the traffic improvements and traffic management schemes) to strengthened ward assemblies. I would want to be assured that a proposal had been widely consulted on, received community approval and dealt with issues such as parking displacement, drop off facilities for station users etc.

3. There have been a number of problems with Lewisham Council contractors employed to maintain our streets and other public spaces (notably works to Brockley Common), including delays, poor quality work and poor quality materials being used. What will you do to improve performance?

Lewisham is poor at monitoring contractors and contracts. This is an area in need of strengthening the recently introduced London Permits scheme should give the Council greater powers to enforce the utilities to work more efficiently and the Council needs to enforce similar constraints on our own contractors.

4. The Council has created a new Conservation Area in Ladywell. How can the Council better enforce the rules in Lewisham's conservation areas, including the high street businesses that ignore current guidelines on shop fronts?

This is another example of Lewisham Council being weak on enforcement. – everything currently is reactive. We need a regime that is proactive in promoting the rules and working with local businesses to conform. This is an issue that strengthened ward assemblies with devolved budgets can tackle more effectively than the Town Hall.

5. Do you support the current plans for the redevelopment of Lewisham Gateway and Convoys Wharf and - if so - what will you do to ensure that the projects are delivered as soon as possible?

No. The Council has failed in the past to produce full planning briefs for any major developments within the borough, these should be based on a full community consultation and be the vision document for anybody submitting a planning application on a major site. It will be necessary to review what consents have lapsed for the Gateway and negotiate with the current owners of Convoys about the way forward now there is a changed economic environment.

6. Does Lewisham Council need to make budget cuts in the next two years and - if so - how much needs to be cut and what specific cuts would you make?

There are many areas of inefficiency currently within Lewisham Council, regardless of the future financial constraints, this is inevitable after 40 years of one party rule and one reason why change is needed locally. There is duplication between many management functions within the council and with partner organisations – i.e. the PCT, Glendale etc.

I want to explore more income generation and improved use of existing resources. The Council currently has an excessive communications budget and poor recruitment policies has led to a reliance on agency staff at all levels within the organisation.

7. How can Lewisham Council increase the number of places at secondary school level and reduce the number of children having to leave the borough to get an education?

I support the building of a new secondary school and will push for its early completion. We will reduce the number of children that go out of Lewisham by improving standards in our schools, smaller class sizes and well resourced facilities are key to that. The admissions policies need reviewing to ensure they are fair to all families and will work with all Lewisham schools to get agreement.

Many of the children that leave Lewisham go to selective schools (grammar schools) elsewhere in London – I believe in all-ability comprehensive schools and will not change current policy, so will have to accept that some parents choose to send their children elsewhere.

8. What should happen to Gordonbrock School now that the decant and rebuild has been delayed by at least 6 months?

I was disappointed by the delay – I do not think children should have to learn in an Edwardian/Victorian environment and deserve modern facilities. I will work to get the expansion completed as quickly as possible. We need an action plan to extend primary school places to meet the current bulge – the result of poor planning by Lewisham.

9. How will you reduce crime and anti-social behaviour (including littering, flytipping and dog-fouling) in the borough?

I would strengthen ward police teams, with enforcement officers from the Council. Bring together all the people involved in fighting anti-social behaviour should make it more effective. Currently the Council has been weak on proactive enforcement work and this needs to be addressed.

Over the past few months there has been an increase in knife crimes within Lewisham. We need to protect young people from this – I want to see a zero tolerance of knives being carried and will introduce random knife arches and searches, until the message is understood that knives are not to be carried on the streets in Lewisham.

10. As a result of various stock transfers, an ALMO and a PFI contract, Lewisham's social housing is fragmented between a lot of different landlords. This places a massive burden on the council in terms of ensuring consistent service provision and neighbourhood engagement. What will you do as Mayor to deliver on this?'

We are stuck with the variety of housing providers because that was the decision taken by the previous administration. I do not think it necessarily leads to problems suggested in the question – one boroughwide provider delivering a poor service was far worse than now where some provision is very good in parts of Lewisham. I believe in local solutions and do not think boroughwide neighbour engagement is better than trying to ensure that people are involved with the decisions that affect them and their immediate area. Ensuring a consistent service across the borough is not just a housing issue – inspection and monitoring is a area needing improvement by Lewisham Council.

25 comments:

Brockley Kate said...

I like the idea of devolving a range of powers to ward assemblies. That would give local councillors (and others who participate, obviously) much more opportunity to influence their areas, which would really enhance democratic accountability.

Brockley Nick said...

That was my idea!

http://ow.ly/1EChc

Brockley Kate said...

Policy-maker to the stars, eh ...

Paul G said...

I'm confused by the Lib Dem approach to the Mayoral position. Tam Langley (the Lib Dem MP candidate) has stated an intention (if elected) to "work to abolish Lewisham's failed Mayoral system".

He mentioned devolving powers, but is Chris Maines actually standing for the role in order to abolish it? That might be a very good thing, but some clarity would be good.

Robert said...

"I do not think children should have to learn in an Edwardian/Victorian environment"


Well that's one less vote for you then Mr Mains.

What a odd answer to this question.

Anonymous said...

Chris Maines clearly stated at the hustings on Monday that he would call for a referendum to abolish the position of Mayor if he was voted in. Alone he cannot abolish it, it has to go to a referendum.

name said...

If this guy is going to be our mayor. I'd really like to hear a lot more from him and about him.

I broadly agreement with the ideas he has come up with here. Devolving power to ward assemblies is something that would be of great benefit to area like Brockley, because we have the networks, in place to effectively use the resources.

Can anyone who has worked with this guy shed some light on him? His reputation for getting things done?

Tressilliana said...

Name, I took that comment to mean that Chris Maines does not think children and staff should be working in cramped classrooms and that he thinks outside toilets are a bad thing - not that he thinks all Victorian/Edwardian buildings should be abolished.

Tressilliana said...

Sorry, Robert, not Name.

Sparrow said...

But there again, Robert, he's for getting rid of the Mayor and devolving power to ward assemblies, which, in my opinion is a far more democratic way of doing things, so does it really matter what he thinks on that issue? But I agree it is an odd opinion.

Anonymous said...

Not worded briliantly but not that obscure, as tressiliana says. Educational and welfare facilities should be the no1 factor surley. Would be interesting to see where the teachers stand, it's their workspace.

name said...

This is what've gleaned so far from the web about this guy.

Chris Maines as the Liberal Democrat Mayor of Lewisham will:

Freeze Council Tax for at least two years

Build the first council houses for a decade

Strengthen local police teams

Double the amount we recycle

Provide more facilities, activities and opportunities for young people

Campaign to abolish the executive Mayoral system.

http://www.maines4mayor.org.uk/policy.php

Paul G said...

Re Anoymous's comment that "Chris Maines clearly stated at the hustings on Monday that he would call for a referendum to abolish the position of Mayor if he was voted in." Why don't any of his answers on this blog or stated priorities in his literature deal with abolishing the position? Is he fudging the point because it makes campaigning for the position too difficult? Tam Langley's very clear on the point - why can't Chris be?

Chris Maines said...

I am happy to clarify my position regarding an elected Mayor.

The position should be abolished and replace with a system of governance where decisions are reached after debate and challenge.

The current system in Lewisham centralised power and does not allow for proper challenge and scrutiny prior to decisions being made. I think an opposition plays a vital role in a democracy. I also believe that policy making should be devolved to the lowest level possible - so people have influence over decisions affecting their own community. The same solutions are not necessarily right for all the vaired communities in Lewisham.

However, current legislation has barred reversing referendrum until ten years have lapsed. (Except in cases like Stoke - because there were fears that the BNP would win).

The model of Elected Mayors panders to personality rather than policy based politics. In Doncaster there have been 2 mavericks elected and the Council is totally dysfunctional and vital social services on the verge of collapse.

If elected I would try to work myself out of a job and would hope to be the last elected Mayor.

Chris Maines said...

I think the Brockley Society are wrong to delay the much needed new Gordonbeck School.
Sorry if that loses me votes.
I would hope we can maintain older buildings and protect our heritage. But that has to be balanced with children being educated in a suitable environment.
When Lewisham Bridge school was listed - the report implied it was unquie because the toilets had not been improved since 1900's (Had Lewisham Council maintained and modernised those facilities over the last 100 years it would not had been listed) A bit unfair of the children who have to use these facilities every day.

Anonymous said...

First hustings candidate to actually reply to follow-up questions, I think - kudos to you, Chris.

Real Estate Ringwood said...

To enhancing the democracy the ward system is appreciating. With this the councilors develop their areas more. Thanks for the fantastic idea.....

Real Estate Sydney said...

I agree with Chris, Brockley Society did not works properly. why the facility was not thinking about school students. the services provided to them are not good.

Binary Options said...

Why Brockley Society is playing with students future...please provide them right services which is necessary for them...

Real Estate Burleigh Heads said...

Very detailed article. I really appreciate you. It really helps my trading to take it all in.

Property Management Gold Coast said...

Your whole queries have cleared my all doubts. Thanks for helping me...

Anonymous said...

School buildings - as someone who went to school where the buildings were 200 years old and a university where the buildings were 400 years old - buildings are the least important part of the education equation and the easiest to blame when things go wrong.

My children all went to school in Victorian buildings too. I do not believe their education suffered.

In my day etc.... said...

you forgot to say "as a hard working taxpayer"

No buildings in themselves do not cause a poor education. Buildings that cannot support the requirements of a modern school or are difficult and expensive to maintain and convert could.

If Lewisham had the buget of Eaton or Harrow they may be able to do something. They don't so they can't.

Tamsin said...

But the situation is never helped by the set-in-stone distinctions between capital and maintenance spend. If some of the capital costs of demolition and re-build could have been spent over the years in maintenance the replacement of old (and subtantial) buildings with new ones with a "shelf life" of only a few decades would not be necessary.

Property Management Brisbane said...

What about the students. It is always the same politicians will always put themselves first

Latest Tweets

Brockley Central Label Cloud

Click one of the labels below to see all posts on that subject. The bigger the label, the more posts there are!